<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 周杰伦不会编曲？</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happysky.org/archives/969/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happysky.org/archives/969</link>
	<description>以群，以独</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodhi</title>
		<link>http://www.happysky.org/archives/969/comment-page-1#comment-26086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happysky.org/?p=969#comment-26086</guid>
		<description>如果音乐学院的师生这么说那就不合适了，但是单从听众审美来讲，职业背景、年龄差更或者是教育背景都是会带来差别的。更何况聊侃的严谨性是不能和论文相比的 o(∩_∩)o...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>如果音乐学院的师生这么说那就不合适了，但是单从听众审美来讲，职业背景、年龄差更或者是教育背景都是会带来差别的。更何况聊侃的严谨性是不能和论文相比的 o(∩_∩)o&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sapphire</title>
		<link>http://www.happysky.org/archives/969/comment-page-1#comment-26081</link>
		<dc:creator>sapphire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happysky.org/?p=969#comment-26081</guid>
		<description>啊啊，喜欢周杰伦的歌</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>啊啊，喜欢周杰伦的歌</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

